thinking on it more this sounds like the most damning part of your critique - the very name of this loose group of philosophers is an inaccurate appropriation. as youve been suggesting, they are a new generation of Integralists who are distancing themselves from their lineage with a trendy name, but not in substance, and barely in style.…
thinking on it more this sounds like the most damning part of your critique - the very name of this loose group of philosophers is an inaccurate appropriation. as youve been suggesting, they are a new generation of Integralists who are distancing themselves from their lineage with a trendy name, but not in substance, and barely in style. it kinda feels brutal, but necessary.
thanks for all your insights in these critiques, gives me a lot to chew on for my own development.
well to be fair it's not all of them but there's definitely a heft dose of Integral DNA in the movement. I do want to highlight a version of Metamodernism I am partial to which doesn't stands aside from this strain. Glad the series is helpful for someone else — in large part it's been an attempt to articulate my own discomfort
thinking on it more this sounds like the most damning part of your critique - the very name of this loose group of philosophers is an inaccurate appropriation. as youve been suggesting, they are a new generation of Integralists who are distancing themselves from their lineage with a trendy name, but not in substance, and barely in style. it kinda feels brutal, but necessary.
thanks for all your insights in these critiques, gives me a lot to chew on for my own development.
well to be fair it's not all of them but there's definitely a heft dose of Integral DNA in the movement. I do want to highlight a version of Metamodernism I am partial to which doesn't stands aside from this strain. Glad the series is helpful for someone else — in large part it's been an attempt to articulate my own discomfort