I would certainly wage it does Sherman. That seems to be what led to the progression through the orders of simulacra to simulation itself so it makes sense that the simulation would only be growing more labyrnthine and self-enfolding
I would certainly wage it does Sherman. That seems to be what led to the progression through the orders of simulacra to simulation itself so it makes sense that the simulation would only be growing more labyrnthine and self-enfolding
That would mean any efforts to comprehend or observe the simulation just provides more aspects, data and energy for the simulation to remain incomprehensible and unobserved. I had read Foucault as part of graduate school, but not Baudrillard (I was an amateur 2nd half of life anthropology major not philosophy). I have been introduced to an idea that is pretty unsettling, thank you.
I would certainly wage it does Sherman. That seems to be what led to the progression through the orders of simulacra to simulation itself so it makes sense that the simulation would only be growing more labyrnthine and self-enfolding
That would mean any efforts to comprehend or observe the simulation just provides more aspects, data and energy for the simulation to remain incomprehensible and unobserved. I had read Foucault as part of graduate school, but not Baudrillard (I was an amateur 2nd half of life anthropology major not philosophy). I have been introduced to an idea that is pretty unsettling, thank you.